I don't know... as usual ;-)

Forum: Linux IP NAT Forum
Re: Can NAT do this? (Ennio Porro)
Re: Probably but a little more info may be needed (Bill Harris)
Re: problem with ipnatadm compiling under 2.0.33 (Roberto Favaro)
Keywords: Compiling,Ipnatadm
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 1997 19:08:41 GMT
From: Michael Hasenstein <hasenstein@yahoo.com>

... but I also have problems now that I upgraded to Redhat 5.0. I guess that's because of the new policy not to use includes in applications(?), which is ok but many programs need some changes in their include directives. However, it might also be because ot the 2.0.33 kernel I'm now using, but why should that be... on the other hand, here's someone else with 2.0.33 having problems and he's got no glibc-2 based system. I guess I have to check this, but for now I don't have a solution (so why do I post here at all?!). I don't think I'll do it today, I intend to go to the local (San Carlos) Airport to check for flight training ;-) (I want a license...)

Messages Inline: Outline:

1. (correction of message text) by Michael Hasenstein, 1/13/98

2. Compiling IP NAT in RedHat 5.1 distribution by Francis Baud, 9/23/98

3. Compiling IP NAT in RedHat 5.1 distribution by Francis Baud, 9/23/98